December 10, 2023 – YEAR B
COMMENTARYBIBLE STUDYFR TONY'S HOMILY

Michal Hunt

Brant Pitre

Fr. Francis Martin


Mass Readings Explained

2nd Sunday of Advent B

YouTube player
Many people think that Christ is delayed in returning, and not much was different at the time of the early Church. Many were expecting the end of the world and the return of Christ to come within years of his death. But the decades passed and he did not return. See how the Second letter of Peter responds to this point on whether or not God is delayed in returning at the end of time.

MORE VIDEOS / TRANSCRIPT

Michal
Hunt

Agape Bible Commentary

2nd Sunday of Advent B

1st Reading: God is Coming to Free His People

God instructed the 8th century BC prophet Isaiah to prophesy to the covenant people concerning their future exile in Babylon. Their exile judgment was divine punishment for their many sins and their apostasy from the Sinai Covenant (Is 39:5-7). In today's First Reading, after the harsh oracle of the exile, God instructed Isaiah to console the people by assuring them that while they were making atonement for their sins in exile, He would not abandon or forget them. He reminded them that God is Israel's Divine Shepherd who cares for the sheep of His flock. He would forgive their sins and bring about the release of His people from their captivity. God would prepare the way for their return to their homes in the Promised Land, gently leading them like a shepherd leads his flock. Not only would He restore them to the land, but He would restore the peace of His covenant relationship with them.

Michal E Hunt, Copyright © 2014; revised 2023 Agape Bible Study; used with permission

2nd Reading: The Lord's Coming

In our Second Reading from St. Peter's second letter to the Universal Church, he warns us that the promised sudden return of Jesus Christ can happen at any moment. The Second Advent of Christ only seems delayed because God, in His mercy, allows time for the entire earth to hear the Gospel message of salvation. Using the imagery of a roaring fire and a cosmic meltdown, the inspired writer describes the Second Coming of Christ when He will return as humanity's divine Judge and inaugurate a new creation. The old world will pass away, and God will create a new Heaven and earth where every living thing will flourish in righteousness in the Presence of the Almighty. The knowledge that Christ could come in judgment at any moment should instill in each of us a desire to repent our sins and to persevere in holiness so that He will find us in a state of grace at the moment of His inevitable coming.

Michal E Hunt, Copyright © 2014; revised 2023 Agape Bible Study; used with permission

Gospel: Repent and Prepare for the Coming of the Lord

In today's Gospel Reading, St. Mark tells us that Israel's historic deliverance from the Babylonian exile prefigures an even greater act of God. It is the promise of redemption made possible for humanity by the Redeemer Messiah, announced by the prophetic voice of the last Old Testament prophet, St. John the Baptist. Quoting from the Isaiah passage in our First Reading, St. Mark assures us that God the Son came to fulfill the promises of the Old Testament prophets. Jesus came to set Israel and the men and women of all nations free from bondage to sin and death. In the Age of Jesus's Kingdom of the Church, His mission continues to save the faithful living in this earthly exile. The Church gathers them into a complete restoration of fellowship with God and the hope of a future life in the Promised Land of Heaven. It is a restoration that Christ will complete in His Second Advent, and we need to continually keep our souls in a state of grace in preparation for the glorious event of His return.

Michal E Hunt, Copyright © 2014; revised 2023 Agape Bible Study; used with permission

READ MORE

Kieran J.
O’Mahony, OSA

INDEX

ARCHIVE

Fr. O’Mahony, OSA

2nd Sunday of Advent B

YouTube player

Fr. Francis Martin

2nd Sunday of Advent B

YouTube player

Fr. Francis Martin +August 11, 2017, served as Professor and then Professor Emeritus of New Testament at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C. He also taught at the Gregorian University in Rome, the Ecole Biblique in Jerusalem, Catholic University in Washington, D.C., Franciscan University of Steubenville), and the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family in Washington, D.C.

Richard Niell
Donovan

Mark 1:1-8 Exegesis
Good News of Jesus Christ

“the Good News of Jesus Christ” (v. 1b) can mean either the good news about Jesus Christ or the good news proclaimed by Jesus Christ. The first meaning makes more sense in this context, but it is possible that Mark’s ambiguity is intentional—that he wants us to savor both meanings—see verse 14, where Jesus proclaims the Gospel as well as embodies it (France, 53).

The Jewish people expect the Messiah to be, not only of the lineage of King David, but of the same type—a strong ruler who will re-establish Israel as an independent and great nation—a warrior/king. In this Gospel, Mark will disabuse them of this notion. It is often said that the shadow of the cross falls across this Gospel. The suffering Christ whom Mark will reveal is very different from the warrior/king whom the Jewish people expect. However, this is not a gloomy book. Mark tells us from the beginning that this story is Good News.

“the Good News (euangelion) of Jesus Christ” (v. 1b). The Greek word euangelion combines the words eu (good) and angellos (to proclaim). Angellos is related to our word angel. Angels were God’s messengers.

• In secular use, euangelion (Good News) was used for a victory in battle—or for the reward given to a messenger who brought word of such a victory.

• In the New Testament, euangelion is usually translated Good News or Gospel. The word Gospel comes from the Old English “god spel,” which means “good news.”

• In the New Testament, euangelion is used in two ways:

(1) Most often, it is used for the proclamation of the Good News of Jesus Christ.

(2) However, as Mark uses it in this verse—the gospel of Jesus Christ—it can serve as a title for his account of the life of Christ. Christians have seized on this to speak of “The Gospel of Mark” (or Matthew or Luke or John)—accounts of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Mark was the first of the four Gospels to be written, so this verse is the first time euangelion is used in that way. Later, Justin Martyr (100-165 A.D.) will write about a worship service “at which the ‘memoirs of the apostles… called gospels’ were read out to the congregation (Apol i.66). (However), the plural ‘gospels’ was not a NT usage” (Martin, 529).

© 1997-2023 Richard Niell Donovan

John came baptizing in the wilderness” (v. 4a)

“John came baptizing in the wilderness” (v. 4a). It seems counter-intuitive that John would go to the wilderness to proclaim his message. Why not go to the city, where people live? The answer is that the wilderness has special meaning to the Jewish people. It was to the freedom of the wilderness that God led them from their slavery in Egypt. It was in the wilderness that they became a nation. The answer is also that John the Baptist is the embodiment of Elijah the prophet, who was associated with the wilderness (1 Kings 17:2-3). The scriptures promised the return of Elijah (Malachi 4:5). John’s dress and diet link him with Elijah. Later Jesus will tell us that Elijah has, indeed, returned—“and they did to him whatever they pleased, as it is written about him” (9:13)—clearly pointing to John, whose arrest is mentioned at 1:14.

John comes preaching “the baptism (baptisma – a dipping, plunging, or immersion) of repentance (metanoias – a change of mind or direction) for forgiveness of sins” (v. 4b).

There are two traditions from which John’s baptism could be derived:

• One is ritual washings with which people cleansed themselves of spiritual impurity. Ritual bathing was especially important in the Qumran community with which John may have had some connection.

• The other tradition is proselyte baptism of Gentile converts to Judaism, an initiatory cleansing rite performed by immersion.

However, there are differences between each of these traditions and John’s baptism:

• Ritual bathing was a self-administered, oft-repeated ritual, but John personally administers baptism, apparently as a one-time rite.

• Proselyte baptism was for Gentiles only, signifying entry into membership in the people of God. Jews were already members of the people of God, and thus assumed to need no baptism. John’s baptism, however, is directly specifically to the Judeans and Jerusalemites who came to hear him—presumably all Jews.

It seems likely that John borrows from both traditions (ritual washings and proselyte baptism), but establishes his own baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. Regarding his requirement that Jews be baptized, prophets such as John were called by God to help people see with new eyes—and to respond in new and often uncomfortable ways. In this instance, John is telling the Jews that they are in need of God’s forgiveness. In that, they are no different than Gentiles. John baptized them to prepare them for the day when God would come in judgment. It was a first step toward a new life.

John’s is a baptism of repentance. We tend to think of repentance as feeling guilty about our sins, but it is more—much more. The Greek word, metanoia, means a change of mind or direction. It is related to the Hebrew word tesubah, used by prophets to call Israel to abandon its sinful ways and to return to God. Both words (metanoia and tesubah) imply “a total change of spiritual direction” (Marcus, 150).

When we learn a new and better way of thinking, we naturally respond by changing our behavior to accord with our new understanding. If our earlier actions harmed others or ourselves, we will feel sorry that we acted in those ways and for the harm that we caused. In that sense, guilt is part of repentance, but guilt becomes true repentance only when it causes us to change our mind and direction.

© 1997-2023 Richard Niell Donovan

John was clothed with camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist. He ate locusts and wild honey” (v. 6).

“John was clothed with camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist. He ate locusts and wild honey” (v. 6). The description of John is intended to identify him with Elijah, whom the Old Testament describes as “a hairy man, with a leather belt around his waist” (2 Kings 1:8).

• John’s diet of locusts and wild honey also places him in the prophetic tradition—the prophet Daniel declined a royal diet in preference for vegetables and water (Daniel 1:8-16). The Torah specifies locusts as a permissible food—the modern word is kosher (Leviticus 11:22). Jewish tradition does not classify locusts as meat, so it would suit an ascetic such as John the Baptist (see Matthew 11:18; Luke 7:33) (Marcus, 151).

• Also, John’s confrontation with Herod Antipas (6:18) is reminiscent of Elijah’s confrontation with Ahab (1 Kings 18). In both cases, it was the wives that proved truly dangerous. Ahab’s wife, Jezebel, failed in her attempt to kill Elijah (1 Kings 19), but succeeded only in scaring him. However, Herod’s wife, Herodias, will succeed in her effort to kill John the Baptist (6:16-29).

© 1997-2023 Richard Niell Donovan

READ MORE