Commentary and bible study from Fr. Tim Peters, Larry Broding, and others for the Mass readings for 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year A): 1 Kings 3:5, 7-12 Romans 8:28-30 Matthew 13:44-52

Commentary Intro to Mass Readings Sunday Readings

CommentaryIntro to Mass Readings Sunday Readings

July 26, 2026

1ST READING2ND READINGGOSPEL

17th Sunday of Year A

create a modern 16.9 infographic based on xxxxxxxxxxxxx with large images and extra large bold Arial fonts. Keep it simple

Create a simple, modern infographic illustrating [INSERT BIBLE PASSAGE OR TOPIC]. Use a [SPLIT-SCREEN / 3-PANEL] layout. The style should be clean, high-quality digital art or vector illustration.

Visuals:

Panel 1: Show [DESCRIBE SCENE 1 – e.g., a stormy sea].

Panel 2: Show [DESCRIBE SCENE 2 – e.g., Jesus calming the waves].

Text & Typography:

Font: Use EXTRA LARGE, BOLD, SANS-SERIF FONT (like Arial). Ensure high contrast so text is easily readable.

Header: Write “[INSERT MAIN TITLE]” at the top.

Captions: Include short, punchy text summaries in the panels: “[TEXT FOR PANEL 1]” and “[TEXT FOR PANEL 2]”.

Overall Vibe: Professional, educational, and uncluttered. Avoid small details; focus on big images and big text.

YouTube player

Video courtesy of Fr. Bryan Kujawa | Catholic Bible Studies

1 Kings 3:5, 7-12

by Larry Broding

What do most people want? What do they really pray for?

As Solomon consolidated his royal power, but before he finished the palace and the Temple in Jerusalem, the young king made visits outside the city. On one visit to a Gibeon, a “high place” used for local worship, Solomon slept in the sanctuary hoping for dream of divine revelation. Within the famous dream, God asked the king for his heart’s desire. “Wisdom,” came the king’s answer. Notice that wisdom had the power to deliver many of the mundane desires into Solomon’s hands anyway (long life, the life of an enemy, etc.) . But wisdom was far more. It was a virtue that brought the king closer to God. For only God can give true wisdom. And God gave the young king the virtue in abundance.

When we pray, do we pray for the mundane? Or do we pray for the higher gifts? While there is certainly nothing wrong in praying for daily needs and concerns, let us not forget God can give us so much more.

What spiritual gift do you pray for? How could wisdom help you in your growth to God?


17th Sunday of Year A

YouTube player

Video courtesy of Fr. Bryan Kujawa | Catholic Bible Studies

Romans 8:28-30

by Larry Broding

Why did Christ come to earth and die? How does his appearance and death speak to our situation today?

Why did Christ come to earth as a human being? Why did he have to die? These basic questions form the core of faith. The answers, surprisingly, are self-centered. God sent his Son into the world, to die and rise, for us! According to Paul, God foresaw and planned for the moment his Church became a reality. As Church, we are the ones God chose according to his own purposes. We are the ones who would be formed into the image of his Son and would receive glory. We are the ones who will ultimately see the good of God’s providence, even though our lives have struggles. Christ came for us! This shows the immense depth and power of God’s love.

Although these verses refer to us the saved, we should not presume a hard and fast definition of “predestination” from Paul’s words. God wills all people to follow his Son, but does not force such. God does not pick and choose his people, then condemn the rest; the invitation is universal. But the invitation can be turned down. That is the result of free will. We have the power to tell God “NO!”

Unlike many Protestant congregations, the Catholic Church has never defined the relationship between free will and grace. Is grace so irresistible it can overpower free will? Common sense says “no.” Following this insight, many Catholic theologians hold to the dictum: “Grace builds on nature.” God made us incomplete; his grace completes us. Misuse of free will only denies that fulfillment; it does not warp us to the point we cannot accept grace.

Made whole by grace, we can do God’s will and realize his goodness. We can understand the scope of his plans. We know he called us into a people he envisioned from the beginning. And we can see the end game of his providence. We realize all this because of what Christ did for us.

How can the example of Christ show you God’s plans for your life? How does Christ inspire and empower you to do God’s will?


17th Sunday of Year A

YouTube player

Video courtesy of Fr. Bryan Kujawa | Catholic Bible Studies

Matthew 13:44-52

Larry Broding

What is the greatest reward the world can offer you? What are you willing to sacrifice so you can own it?

Everyone makes a life choice that leads to a life compromise. When people get married, they forsake all others for matrimony. When people buy housing, they may not be able to afford additional dwellings. When people choose careers, they close the door on other earning options. Every single “yes” leads to many “no’s.”

Every person makes an ultimate choice about life. This choice reveals and defines the character of the person. The choice clearly tells others what gives this person a sense of purpose. Some people choose possessions, popularity, or power. Others cling to security. Still, a few risk all for a greater prize. In today’s passage, Jesus addressed those who gave up all for the Kingdom.

In these passages, Matthew presented three parables, two about choice, one about the consequences of choice. In the end, he painted another parable image about the one who presented the choice for God’s Kingdom.

13:45 “a man, a merchant” The inclusion of man with merchant is redundant in English, but adds emphasis in Greek. The exact meaning of “merchant” is unclear. We do not whether the merchant was a trader (who would resell the pearl for a greater price) or a collector (who desired the pearl for himself). The later interpretation is preferred.

In Matthew’s gospel, Jesus gave his followers these three parables about God’s Kingdom. The first two gave a “cost-benefit analysis.” The Kingdom cost everything but had the greatest value. However, the risk to obtain the Kingdom might escape our modern sensibilities. The contemporaries of Jesus might have considered the risk so high that only a fool would have taken it.

In the first parable, a worker found a treasure buried in a field. In a time without a sophisticated banking system, people buried their treasure away from their dwelling so save it from thieves. Occasionally, people did hear of others finding treasure. But, no one ever sold what little they had, regardless of the reason. (Never mind a field worker could never really raise the cash to buy the plot.) What did a person possess for financial support? In addition, simply owning the field did not guarantee ownership of the treasure. It merely insured access to the treasure. Ownership of the field and the treasure were two separate legal issues under ancient law. Why would anyone risk all to insure access to a treasure they did not own? [13:44]

The parable of the merchant and the pearl addressed the same issue. At the time of Jesus, pearls had the same status as gold and precious gems. The merchant in the parable made a livelihood from the buying and selling of pearls. Only profit motivated him. But, the sight of an exception pearl changed him. The merchant abandoned the ability to make a living when he sold all his assets. The merchant made himself truly poor, so he could possess that exceptional pearl. And, to return to his former life, the merchant would have to sell the pearl he gave all to possess. Why would anyone take such a risk? [13:45-46]

Jesus painted the absurd images found in these two parables to reveal the risk factor of God’s Kingdom. God’s Kingdom demanded everything from the believer. Loyalty to family or neighbors, the desire for financial security, the drive for political power, all came second. The believer must put God first in all things, even if he or she looked like a fool.

13:48 “clean” and “unclean” are literally “good” and “bad.” In the Jewish context of Matthew, the judgment of fish was most likely based on the dietary laws found in the Torah, not a judgment of taste or usefulness. Hence, the use of “clean” and “unclean.”

13:49 “separate the evil from the midst of the righteous” could be a judgment on the world or on those in the Christian community. The direction of the judgment is unclear.

Jesus told the last parable as a counter weight to the fears people face when they consider the faith option. God’s messengers would separate the bad from the good. Then, these messengers would punish the evil in a fiery furnace. Separation meant judgment, both human and divine.

On one level, the separation was a local judgment. The messengers (like the fishermen in the parable) preached to many people (like casing a great net into the lake). The message might attract great numbers, but which listeners had the will and the ability to join the community? This required the wisdom of the church elders (like the fishermen who kept the “clean” fish but rejected the others). [13:47-48]

On another level, the separation was God’s final judgment. All people would gather. God would separate the evil from the good (i.e., those doing right). And the age of humanity would end. The dawn of God’s age would begin. [13:49-50]

As past studies have intimated, the early Christian communities saw their ministry as an extension of Christ’s Messianic mission. Jesus came into the world to announce God’s Kingdom and gather everyone into the Kingdom. As Jesus preached and formed a Church, he scandalized others. The scandal he caused separated families and friends. In other words, as Jesus evangelized, he forced a choice and a judgment.

Like Christ, the drives of the local Christian communities to evangelize foreshadowed God’s final judgment and, in a sense realized, that judgment. No matter who preached, the impact of the Good News united believers, but separated unbelievers. The Gospel itself had the power of God’s final judgment.

13:52 “every scribe having been taught in the Kingdom” There are two interpretations of this phrase. First, the scribe could be an expert about the Kingdom. In this case, the scribe was a leader in the community. Or, second, the scribe could have been a learned man who submitted himself to God’s rule. In other words, he was an expert in the Torah under God’s kingdom, a Jewish scribe who became a Christian.

With the power to separate as he preached, the evangelist had to choose his or her words carefully. When those in Matthew’s Jewish-Christian audience (those who studied the Kingdom) witnessed to their contemporaries (other Jews), they had to know the Law (the old things of 13:52), but present them in a new way. They had to have the knowledge of experts (scribes), in order to address the questions of the informed audience. [13:52]


Video courtesy of Larry Broding.

Sunday Prep Videos

17th Sunday of Year A

Free Clip Art